For thousands of years men have been killing each other in the name of religion. And the topic of holy land is of prime importance.The holier the land more bloody is the fight. To induce some sanity in this holy mess, Scott Adams some years ago introduced "point in space "theory with utmost logic and spacial relevance. According to him, no place can be defined as holy because for a place to be holy first you must have had a holy deed done at that place. Assuming that the deed has indeed been done, given that we are all travelling(the earth) constantly in space ,that particular point in space has already been left behind.
Now not everyone is going to buy this theory and adamant holy land fighters will still believe in holiness of land.If indeed we have holy land, an important aspect is how deep does the holiness extend too. This is important because according to Adams, if the holiness extends all the way then the land on the other side will also exhibit holiness.
To solve such complexities it must be agreed by Holinesses all around the world that any holiness must extend only till the core of earth.
A simple solution then to Ayodhya problem will be to dig and lift the Babri Masjid from its foundation up and place it outside the holy land area. This surely will lead to the top layer of holiness being lost but if the holiness does extend to the core of the earth, surely it represents only a small part of overall holiness.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment